EB-5 Litigation Update Post #3: Behring seeks to overturn EB-5 Regs in USCIS lawsuit

March 31st, 2021 Peter Bibler

Behring is in the news again for our latest efforts to improve the EB-5 industry in its EB-5 lawsuit against USCIS. This time is different though. We are not just innovating to offer better EB-5 investments, but to save the industry as a whole. After the new EB-5 rules started in November 2019, the industry saw a 99% collapse in new investor petitions, essentially killing the EB-5 Program. On December 21, 2020, Behring filed a complaint against DHS and USCIS and moved for an injunction to vacate these 2019 EB-5 regulations. If the EB-5 lawsuit is successful, the EB-5 Immigrant Investor Modernization Rule will be set aside, and the minimum investment amount will go back to $500,000, and the old methodology for TEA designation will be restored. In other words, the EB-5 industry will be back — creating US jobs and offering EB-5 investors the opportunity for a green card for them and their families.

An overview of Behring’s USCIS lawsuit can be viewed here: Summary

Behring is on the Verge of Winning the Lawsuit Against USCIS and the Court Strongly Considering Overturning 2019 EB-5 Regulations from the USCIS Lawsuit

On March 25, 2021, Behring had its first hearing in front of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The court heard arguments from both sides. The arguments included:

  • The EB-5 rule is invalid because the Acting Secretary of DHS and the Acting Chief of USCIS were unlawfully appointed without confirmation by the U.S.Senate.


  • DHS actions were arbitrary and capricious because it failed to consider properly the economic impact of the new regulations, including the increase in the minimum investment amounts, new TEA definitions for high unemployment areas for urban metropolitan centers, and the process for certifying TEAs.


  • The EB-5 rule has resulted in a 99.07% drop in new EB-5 filings, all but killing the program, because of the increased investment amounts and the uncertainty caused by USCIS’s lack of guidance on TEA designation and forcing prospective investors to wait years before receiving confirmation of TEA approval.

Although the court did not rule on the preliminary injunction, it converted Behring’s motion for a preliminary injunction into a motion for summary judgment on the limited issue of whether the Acting Secretary of DHS and the Acting Chief of USCIS were unlawfully appointed. This means because the issue involves only a question of law, no trial is necessary. The court asked the parties to brief further arguments about the “defacto officer doctrine” (i.e. the regulations should remain in place even if the officer responsible for implementation was not properly appointed). The court also requested the parties to brief the proper remedies should the court vacate the regulations. According to Greenberg Traurig, the attorneys for Behring, this is a strong indicator that Behring’s EB-5 lawsuit will succeed. A notion confirmed by the headlines of numerous news outlets reporting on the hearing immediately after it closed.

Next Steps in USCIS Lawsuit

The EB-5 lawsuit is still pending. Arguments must be submitted by April 22, 2021. The court may rule on the written briefs alone, but a final hearing is set for May 6, 2021.

If the EB-5 regulations are vacated, then the $500,000 minimum investment amount and former TEA designation process and definitions will likely be restored. There would be no likely effect on I-526 petitions filed after November 21, 2019 as the old rules would cover these new EB-5 petitions.

See Who Else Is Talking About Behring and the USCIS Lawsuit

IIUSA provides case update on Behring’s EB-5 lawsuit.

Greenberg Traurig, representing Behring in EB-5 lawsuit, states that the judge’s request to submit briefs on remedies if the regulations were invalidated is a strong indicator of the outcome.

Behring’s EB-5 lawsuit against USCIS is a “positive development for the industry” and can “provide more leverage and opportunity for a meaning legislative proposal that may benefit both investors and regional centers.”

Learn More About Behring EB-5

To learn more about the USCIS lawsuit or to see if Behring EB-5 is the right solution for you and your family, contact Behring for a free consultation.

If the EB-5 regulations are invalidated and the $500,000 investment amount is restored, it is likely only for a limited time. The sunset date for the EB-5 Regional Center Program is June 30, 2021. New legislation is expected to change the required investment amounts.


Litigation Update Posts

EB-5 Litigation Update Post #10: DHS Has Dropped Their Appeal in Behring Regional Center v. Wolf, et al Lawsuit

In June 2021, Behring won its lawsuit against DHS, reversing the EB-5 regulations that were implemented in November 2019. In August 2021, DHS filed a motion to appeal the court's ruling. Today, January 5, 2022, the Department of Homeland Security withdrew its appeal of the Behring Regional Center LLC v. Alejandro N. Mayorkas, et al ...

EB-5 Litigation Update Post #9: DHS Files Notice of Appeal in Behring Regional Center v Wolf

Today, DHS filed its notice of appeal on the last day before the 60-day window expired in Behring Regional Center v. Wolf et al. This is not cause for alarm, and EB-5 investors should not make hasty decisions and feel they must rush to make new EB-5 investments. Contrary to some reports already floating around,

EB-5 Litigation Update Post #8: USCIS reinstates Form I-526 from April 2019 with $500,000 investment amount: Too little too late for some.

Background: Behring Regional Center Vs. Chad Wolf et al. In November 2019, the EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program experienced regulation changes that would prove to instantly stall the program from being used to invest, create jobs and immigrate. The new regulations included new regulations and increased investor and operating requirements. Most notably, the minimum investment amount

EB-5 Litigation Update Post #7: Behring Wins EB-5 Lawsuit, Court Vacates 2019 EB-5 Modernization Rule, $500,000 TEAs

Behring Regional Center Secures Major Legal Win Against DHS: Court Vacates 2019 EB-5 Modernization Rule Download - Read the Decision Today, the US District Court for the Northern District of California ruled in favor of Behring Regional Center, vacating the 2019 EB-5 Modernization Rule. The court agreed that DHS had no authority to implement the ...

EB-5 Litigation Update Post #6: May 13, 2021 Hearing

Behring Regional Center had its final EB-5 hearing on May 13, 2021 before the US District Court for the Northern District of California in its lawsuit against DHS and USCIS. In Behring Regional Center vs. Wolf, et al, Behring seeks to block the 2019 EB-5 Modernization Rule that derailed the EB-5 Program’s reasonable operability and ...

EB-5 Litigation Update Post #5: Behring’s Litigation Glossary

Behring’s case against DHS is still pending. The government is expected to file a brief to reply to Behring’s arguments against the validity of DHS’s recent attempt to ratify the 2019 EB-5 Modernization Rule on April 22, 2021…

EB-5 Litigation Update Post #4: DHS Secretary Mayorkas Ratifies 2019 EB-5 Modernization Rule

Behring’s case against DHS challenging the validity of the 2019 EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program Modernization Rule is currently pending in federal district court. The next court date is May 6, 2021 when the court is expected to issue a final ruling…

EB-5 Litigation Update Post #2: Biden’s Announced Immigration Priorities Gives Hope for Behring’s Push for a Revitalized EB-5 Program

Not wasting any time, on his first day as the 46th US President, Biden signed 17 Executive Orders and unveiled his priorities for immigration reform. Six orders addressed immigration. He immediately repealed the travel ban on majority-Muslim countries. He also halted construction of the border wall near the border with Mexico. Importantly, Biden announced proposed legislation to…

EB-5 Litigation Update Post #1: Behring challenges DHS authority to Enact EB-5 Modernization Rules

Behring argues, in part, that the EB-5 Modernization Rule is invalid because the purported heads of DHS and USCIS had not been duly appointed under the Presidential nomination and Senate consent process at the time they promulgated the Rule. The claim stems from the continued controversy at DHS and USCIS where a series of officials have taken on the positions only to resign later…   

EB-5 Litigation Updates Page

Behring Regional Center v. Wolf, et al.    Get the latest updates straight from the source.  Welcome to Behring’s EB-5 Litigation Update Page. Here, we aim to provide stakeholders in the EB-5 Program frequent updates on Behring’s lawsuit against the DHS stemming from the adverse effects of its implementation of the EB-5 Modernization Rule. See ...