Back

EB-5 Litigation Update Post #1: Behring challenges DHS authority to Enact EB-5 Modernization Rules

January 22nd, 2021 Kyle Behring

The Case – Essential Arguments and Why It Has a Chance 

 

Behring argues, in part, that the EB-5 Modernization Rule is invalid because the purported heads of DHS and USCIS had not been duly appointed under the Presidential nomination and Senate consent process at the time they promulgated the Rule. The claim stems from the continued controversy at DHS and USCIS where a series of officials have taken on the positions only to resign later.   

The appointments of the Secretary of DHS and the Director of USCIS both must come with the advice and the consent of the Senate. Since April 2019 there has been no DHS Secretary confirmed by the Senate since April 2019. Instead, the Trump administration attempted to circumvent the nomination and confirmation process by elevating Chad Wolf as Acting Secretary after the former Acting Secretary McAleenan resigned on November 13, 2019 (who himself had replaced the last properly appointed head, Secretary Nielsen, who had resigned on April 10, 2019). After the resignation of USCIS Director Cissna, the Trump administration foresaw that Cuccinelli would face a difficult confirmation hearing. Instead, it appointed him to a newly-created position, claiming this position would permit him to assuming the role of Acting Director (and avoiding the need for Senate confirmation). 

Behring argues these machinations violate the Federal Vacancies Reform Act (FVRA) and the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (HSA), and therefore, any actions performed under Wolf were in violation of the law, including enacting the new EB-5 regulations.  

Precedent for Behring’s Case 

 

The thrust behind Behring’s arguments that DHS officials acted without legal authority finds support from other federal court decisions as well as the government’s own findings by the Government Accountability Office (GAO), an agency that provides Congress nonpartisan investigative services. 

First, in early March 2020, in a lawsuit brought by asylum-seekers challenging rules restricting their abilities to consult with legal counsel among other rights, a federal judge ruled that Cuccinelli’s appointment as acting director of USCIS “cannot be squared with the text, structure, or purpose of the FVRA” and thus was invalid, as were the directives in the underlying case. Although Cuccinelli continued to act as USCIS director, the Trump administration dropped its appeal, essentially conceding the challenge to the directives.  

Then, on August 21, 2020, GAO found that McAleenan, Wolf and Cuccinelli had been appointed improperly in violation of the HSA’s succession order provision (Read the GAO report). GAO’s opinion is not legally binding, but nevertheless provides sound analysis for the subsequent challenges.  

In fact, four federal courts have already ruled against DHS agreeing that Wolf and other officials were illegally appointed, rendering void the rules at issue. Most recently, on November 14, 2020a federal judge in New York, ruled that Wolf was not acting lawful as DHS Secretary, concluding that suspension of DACA was invalid.   

These decisions with other lawsuits pending, including Behring’s case, was the impetus of Wolf’s resignation on January 12, 2021. Behring is hopeful that these events will encourage the government to recognize that the unlawful appointments (and therefore, invalid actions) likewise apply to the EB-5 Modernization Rule and set it aside.  

Join Our Mailing List to Get Updates

Please fill in the form below to subscribe to our mailing to be notified when new EB-5 litigation blog articles are released.

Litigation Update Posts

EB-5 Litigation Update Post #10: DHS Has Dropped Their Appeal in Behring Regional Center v. Wolf, et al Lawsuit

In June 2021, Behring won its lawsuit against DHS, reversing the EB-5 regulations that were implemented in November 2019. In August 2021, DHS filed a motion to appeal the court's ruling. Today, January 5, 2022, the Department of Homeland Security withdrew its appeal of the Behring Regional Center LLC v. Alejandro N. Mayorkas, et al ...

EB-5 Litigation Update Post #9: DHS Files Notice of Appeal in Behring Regional Center v Wolf

Today, DHS filed its notice of appeal on the last day before the 60-day window expired in Behring Regional Center v. Wolf et al. This is not cause for alarm, and EB-5 investors should not make hasty decisions and feel they must rush to make new EB-5 investments. Contrary to some reports already floating around,

EB-5 Litigation Update Post #8: USCIS reinstates Form I-526 from April 2019 with $500,000 investment amount: Too little too late for some.

Background: Behring Regional Center Vs. Chad Wolf et al. In November 2019, the EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program experienced regulation changes that would prove to instantly stall the program from being used to invest, create jobs and immigrate. The new regulations included new regulations and increased investor and operating requirements. Most notably, the minimum investment amount

EB-5 Litigation Update Post #7: Behring Wins EB-5 Lawsuit, Court Vacates 2019 EB-5 Modernization Rule, $500,000 TEAs

Behring Regional Center Secures Major Legal Win Against DHS: Court Vacates 2019 EB-5 Modernization Rule Download - Read the Decision Today, the US District Court for the Northern District of California ruled in favor of Behring Regional Center, vacating the 2019 EB-5 Modernization Rule. The court agreed that DHS had no authority to implement the ...

EB-5 Litigation Update Post #6: May 13, 2021 Hearing

Behring Regional Center had its final EB-5 hearing on May 13, 2021 before the US District Court for the Northern District of California in its lawsuit against DHS and USCIS. In Behring Regional Center vs. Wolf, et al, Behring seeks to block the 2019 EB-5 Modernization Rule that derailed the EB-5 Program’s reasonable operability and ...

EB-5 Litigation Update Post #5: Behring’s Litigation Glossary

Behring’s case against DHS is still pending. The government is expected to file a brief to reply to Behring’s arguments against the validity of DHS’s recent attempt to ratify the 2019 EB-5 Modernization Rule on April 22, 2021…

EB-5 Litigation Update Post #4: DHS Secretary Mayorkas Ratifies 2019 EB-5 Modernization Rule

Behring’s case against DHS challenging the validity of the 2019 EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program Modernization Rule is currently pending in federal district court. The next court date is May 6, 2021 when the court is expected to issue a final ruling…

EB-5 Litigation Update Post #3: Behring seeks to overturn EB-5 Regs in USCIS lawsuit

Behring is in the news again for our latest efforts to improve the EB-5 industry in its EB-5 lawsuit against USCIS. This time is different though. We are not just innovating to offer better EB-5 investments, but to save the industry as a whole. After the new EB-5 rules started in November 2019, the industry ...

EB-5 Litigation Update Post #2: Biden’s Announced Immigration Priorities Gives Hope for Behring’s Push for a Revitalized EB-5 Program

Not wasting any time, on his first day as the 46th US President, Biden signed 17 Executive Orders and unveiled his priorities for immigration reform. Six orders addressed immigration. He immediately repealed the travel ban on majority-Muslim countries. He also halted construction of the border wall near the border with Mexico. Importantly, Biden announced proposed legislation to…

EB-5 Litigation Updates Page

Behring Regional Center v. Wolf, et al.    Get the latest updates straight from the source.  Welcome to Behring’s EB-5 Litigation Update Page. Here, we aim to provide stakeholders in the EB-5 Program frequent updates on Behring’s lawsuit against the DHS stemming from the adverse effects of its implementation of the EB-5 Modernization Rule. See ...

Categories